فصلنامه رهیافت انقلاب اسلامی
پیاپی 58 (بهار 1401)

Cultural diplomacy plays a very important role in international relations. One of the important tools of cultural diplomacy is language and literature. However, few studies have designed a model for the development of cultural diplomacy in the Islamic Republic of Iran, emphasizing the role of Persian language and literature.

The purpose of this study was to design a model for the development of cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran towards Persian-speaking countries with emphasis on the role of Persian language and literature.

The research method was qualitative. The statistical population included all experts in the field of cultural diplomacy and international relations. The sampling method was purposive and a total of 16 interviews were conducted. Grounded theory was used to analyze the data.

In open coding, a total of 62 components were identified. In the axial coding stage, these components were assigned in the form of "causal conditions" (cultural-historical factors, Persian language and literature components, and political factors), "contextual factors" (infrastructural, financial, legal, motivational, and political-cultural-social factors), "intervening factors" (external and internal factors), strategies (22 strategies), and consequences (7 consequences). In the theoretical coding stage, the theoretical model of the research was designed.

If cultural diplomacy is implemented properly, consequences such as the development of cultural and political influence, the development of trade and economic relations, as well as the reduction or ineffectiveness of international sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran can be expected. Therefore, efforts in the development of cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran towards Persian-speaking countries are recommended.

The following article is written regarding the role of the judiciary in maintaining and ensuring the rights of citizens, with regard to the approach of good governance. The main question of the article is whether the performance of the judiciary has an effect on the index of providing citizenship rights as one of the main components of sustainable development and good governance, and if so, how? The hypothesis of the research is that there is a direct and meaningful relationship between the performance of the government and citizen's rights on the one hand, and on the other hand, in achieving good governance indicators. The findings of the research show that according to the political structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran, as outlined in the constitution and upper documents, the judiciary is the main actor in this field, which should pay special attention to this matter. But according to the developments of the contemporary world, this important thing will not be achieved except with the participation of citizens and interaction with the government and the use of new technological capacities, which are all indicators of good governance. In this regard, by increasing the legal capacity of the society and improving the index of the rule of law, the judiciary can be a platform for empowering citizens and strengthening civil institutions, which automatically leads to the provision and guarantee of citizen's rights and, finally, the improvement of good governance indicators. The current research is applied in terms of purpose, and descriptive-analytical in terms of method. Data collection has been done with the help of documentary-library studies.

Talking about the hedonistic society in the eyes of political thinkers is one of the ways to understand the types of desirable political system in different societies. This issue is of particular importance in the eyes of Islamic thinkers, who have raised the issue of happiness both in the Qur'an and in the Sunnah. The current research aims to deal with the hedonistic politics and government in the thought of Farabi and Ayatollah Khamenei. The hypothesis of the present research is that the hedonistic politics and government in Farabi's thought is based on the existence of moral qualities and properties in the eyes of political leaders and members of the society, and in the eyes of Ayatollah Khamenei, it is based on the role of the government in providing the material and spiritual needs of the people. Based on the findings of the research, Farabi's approach to hedonistic politics and government is an attempt to establish a desirable and ideal political system that includes the model of the government of the Messenger of God (PBUH) along with Greek wisdom and is considered an intellectual support for the idea of ​​religious authority. to be But the model considered by Ayatollah Khamenei is in the stage of establishing a political system and a measure to build a new Islamic civilization in the present era. A government can be hedonistic that provides the material and spiritual needs of the people and is separate from the model of western secularism. Posterior and ultimate happiness in Farabi's thought and good life in the worldly and afterlife in Ayatollah Khamenei's thought are the focus of hedonistic politics. In the current research, the descriptive-analytical method and references to Farabi's texts and works and Ayatollah Khamenei's statements have been used.

The purpose of this article is to investigate the effect of political participation on Iran's national security in the period from 1997 to 2005. The two categories of national security and political participation are important topics that have attracted the attention of all governments. Today, national security is one of the undeniable necessities of human life. In the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the issue of national security is one of the basic necessities of the country's legal system. Therefore, various criteria have been predicted in connection with the realization of national security, and one of these criteria is the use of political participation. The main question of the research is, what effect did political participation have on Iran's national security from June 1376 to July 1384? The main hypothesis of the article is that during the period of reforms, paying attention to the indicators of political participation, including the freedom of parties, associations, classes, and the formation of appropriate behavior of the society in the conduct of council elections and their realization, in the consistency and strength of the political system, will increase national security. resulted in. The research results show that one of the most effective factors in establishing national security is participation in various national scenes. Political participation and paying attention to its components is actually a manifestation of the legitimacy of governance and a guarantor of its stability and security, because political participation can be used as the most suitable support for solving political-social and security problems and crises, something that the government Based on the June 2016 elections, according to the components of political participation, political participation mechanisms will guarantee national security in internal and external dimensions. The present research method is descriptive-analytical, which has collected information through the study of documentary and library sources.

Legislation and creating an institution for legislation in Iran has a long history; And it refers to the processes and stages in which rules and regulations are formulated and regulated and finally becomes a law in the framework of a legal system and shapes the beneficiaries, citizens and institutions and regulates their behavior. Legislation, as a general matter, is also affected by the structures and norms of the context in which it is located, and on the other hand, through its legislation, it affects the same structure and norms. Therefore, knowing the obstacles to the realization of a good and desirable legislative system as a part of the structure of good governance can help to improve the legislative process in Iran and achieve good governance in this field. The question of the current research is, what are the priorities and requirements of the legislative process in Iran? In response to this question, the current research using the descriptive-analytical method and in the form of the theory of governance, the structural priorities of the legislative process in Iran, including the quality of legislation, the monitoring program of laws and regulations, revision policies and the formulation of laws and regulations, Reforming the system of monitoring the executive branch and increasing the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms and citizenship has been considered.

The present article examines the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Khatami and Rouhani discourses. The main question of the article is what was the approach to de-escalation in Khatami and Rouhani discourses? The hypotheses that follow this question are as follows: De-escalation of tensions in both Khatami and Rouhani discourses has been the result of their realistic and pragmatic approach to foreign policy. The results of the research show that both discourses believed that the solution to Iran's problems and crises should be sought in improving Iran's image based on existing regional and international realities. Accordingly, both of them sought to put a review of strategies on the agenda while maintaining the basic principles and identity of Iran's foreign policy. Research method in the present study is the qualitative method (descriptive-analytical method) and the data were collected from library sources in the form of phishing.

Discussing the position of expediency in the decision-making of the Guardian Council is one of the important issues. The basic question in this context is what is the position of expediency in the decision-making of the Guardian Council and what was the decision-making process of this council regarding the position of expediency regarding the parliament's approvals in the field of extradition of criminals? The present article is descriptive and analytical and has investigated the mentioned question by using the library method. The results of the research show that in the decision-making process, the Guardian Council has basically based the two principles of observing the principles of the Constitution and Sharia standards, which is the inherent duty of this council. And even though awareness of the requirements of the time and issues of the day is one of the characteristics of the Guardian Council's jurisprudence stated in the constitution, and this can be the necessity of this council's attention to expediency in its decisions, however, the difference of the parliament, which is committed to approving the laws It is according to the interests of the country and the approach of this council in not paying attention to expediency in its decisions led to the formation of the Expediency Council, which is responsible for resolving the differences between the Parliament and the Guardian Council based on the expediency of the system.

According to their needs, different countries have adopted various tools and strategies to prevent corruption. The subject of this research is the comparative comparison of anti-corruption approaches in the two countries of Iran and Sweden. Therefore, the question of this research is, from a comparative point of view, what are the similarities and differences between the two countries of Iran and Sweden in the fight against corruption? The hypothesis of the research is: Iran's laws have paid unsystematic and insufficient attention to the field of corruption prevention and its indicators such as conflict of interest, transparency and the right to access information. In contrast to these superficial and non-structural laws of Iran, in Sweden, attention and respect to the aforementioned principles have a history of nearly three centuries, and there is a systematic, precise and defined charge in the implementation and guarantee of these indicators in Sweden. The findings of this study show that The aforementioned indicators have a non-structural and superficial position in Iran's legal system, while these principles have been implemented in Sweden's legal system for at least the last two centuries, and it has more superficial and detailed defects than Iran's legal system. The research method in this article is a qualitative comparative and descriptive analytical type, and the data has been collected from various sources in the form of a library.

Defense and resistance against enemies and how to face threats and respond to them are central issues in the field of political jurisprudence in Islam. Some justify the use of any violent method to defeat the enemy, and others consider the conditions and criteria for military operations by citing the right of legitimate defense and the necessity of defending the Islamic entity. Examples of these groups are takfiri groups using suicide operations, and another group is the axis of resistance, which, citing martyrdom operations, does not accept resistance and defense against foreign aggression and wants to confront it. The question that is raised is: What is the view of Islamic jurisprudence regarding martyrdom operations in the eyes of resistance groups and suicide operations of Takfiris? The answer that can be given to this question is that the argument of takfiri groups, which use any terrorist method to destroy themselves and others, leads to terrorist operations and is not acceptable. However, the axis of resistance use martyrdom operations to save their lives and others and only in situations where they are attacked and violated by the enemy. The method used in the current research is descriptive-analytical, which is done by using jurisprudential sources in an inferential way.

Velayat al-Faqih is one of the important principles of the constitution, which has undergone changes over time. One of these important changes took place in the revision of the 1368 Constitution. The aim of the current research is to compare the position of the religious authority before and after the revision of the constitution. In fact, the main focus of the review is the changes that have occurred in this principle. The question of the current research is, what are the reasons for the changes in the authority and status of the legal guardian and the application of absolute restriction to it in the revision of the constitution of 1368? The hypothesis of the research is established in such a way that the consolidation of the powers of the jurist, such as the powers of the infallible (PBUH), the more favorable regulation of the relations of the three powers and the solution of the problems of the Islamic system that cannot be solved by normal means, including the reasons for changing the principle of the guardianship of the jurist to the guardianship He is an absolute jurist. The findings of the research show that the absolute authority of the jurist, while adhering to the constitution, which originates from the Sharia, requires powers that can solve the problems of the Islamic system, which can always pose a threat. In the current research, the descriptive-analytical method was used and referring to the details of the deliberations of the Assembly of Constitutional Experts.

Financial security is one of the most important components of citizen's rights, which must be provided by the government or the Islamic ruler, and by referring to the Islamic Sharia, the Qur'an, verses and traditions, attention to this issue can be clearly seen. Therefore, the current article aims to "investigate the position of citizens' financial security in the jurisprudence and legal system"; The main question of the research is, what is the position of financial security in Islamic jurisprudence and Iran? How is it and how does it affect the soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran? The hypothesis of the article is that the most important duty of the ruler in Islamic Sharia is to ensure the financial security of the citizens by adopting measures such as determining the correct general policies to protect the economic security of the citizens and insisting on its implementation through legal mechanisms to avoid damage and threats to financial security. . The results of the research show that Shia jurisprudence has a very high capacity to prepare a coherent legal framework to ensure the economic and financial security of the society, and basically the economic system of the Islamic Republic has been able to provide financial and economic security laws and wealth creation conditions based on this legal system. slow The research method in this article is descriptive-analytical and the data was collected in a library manner.

The current research is based on the theoretical framework of Hyland's meta-discourse to analyze the interaction between the text of the JCPOA and the views related to it. According to this pattern, a text can have meta-discursive tools not just words, and the author may use a group, clause or even a sentence for his meta-discursive tools, especially if the text is in the field of politics, it goes beyond the word and includes the sentence. The question that is raised is how the attitudes of certainty and doubt affect the views towards the JCPOA as an international document? The findings of the research show that the frequency of meta-discursive tools in the whole corpus was more than other verbal variables, and also the findings in two groups of male and female critics in terms of the frequency of meta-discursive tools in men's reviews were more than that of women. In this way, the sexist approach regarding language and its use is also strengthened, and also, more attention is paid to the text of the document than to the parties to the document and the agreement, and despite the fact that the attitude of certainty has a higher percentage. assigned, but in practice and reality it has given the opposite result. The method used in this research is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods.

Electronic government is the use of technological means of communication such as computers and the Internet to provide public services to citizens and other people in a country or region, and provides new opportunities for direct and convenient access of citizens to the government, as well as providing government services directly. does An e-government program may not serve as a universal model due to political, cultural, economic, and demographic factors that must be considered. Especially in Iran, where religious and cultural factors should be taken into account, which should be understood, accepted and used by its citizens for the success of electronic government, and of course, Iran's international commercial arbitration law was approved in September 2016. The basic question is, what are the necessity and requirements for the electronicization of the arbitration system and the speed of implementation of people's legal affairs in Iran? And the hypothesis of the article is that in order to set up an integrated system and fast, easy follow-up and maintain the security of information and quick access to documents, it is necessary to minimize the physical presence and remove paper in the files so that development can be achieved in this way. Among the electronic arbitrations that are related to electronic trade arbitrations in Iran. Considering these cases, this article investigates the possibility, nature and role of electronic government in speeding up the legal work of people and arbitration in Iran.